Monotheism and Monarchy
Absolute Power - Dictatorship
Philosopher King
Faith & Trust In One Divine Ruler
Judea-Christian Bible / Islam Qur'an (One God)
![]()
Vs.
Polytheism and Democracy
What better way to winnow out the truth than by free and open debate?
To think for yourself, question authority and both challenge, argue and cooperate with the collective demos and gods and goddesses of the Assembly, Persuasion, Democracy, Liberty, Equality & Human Rights
![]()
![]()
![]()
Zeus Agoraios
God of the AssemblyPeitho - Goddess of Persuasion
Demos - God of Democratic Populace
![]()
![]()
![]()
Goddess of Liberty
Justina
Goddess of Equality & JusticeGods of Human Rights
Ultimately, it is humans that decide what their religious or spiritual beliefs are and not the other way around. We have a choice, to say otherwise is again a chosen belief. When worship is desired or required within a theistic ideology, what gods or goddesses do we choose? One monotheistic and jealous god? A god with a mono-ideology? A god with an absolute predetermined meaning consisting of prescribed and formulated salvation plan(s), doctrines, laws and rules to follow? Or could we rest in areas of ambiguity that require the burden of freedom and personal responsibility, with values that both act as profound boundaries and yet flexible and yielding due to their relative nature and their accompanying relative circumstances? This is not nihilism, but the ability to think for yourself beyond forced authority.
The Altar of Zeus Agoraios
Monotheism rests in monarchy, absolutism and the control of one decision maker or one small nondemocratic body. It is based on a hierarchical structure with absolute power at the top. It is the antithesis of democracy, that of a citizen participatory structure. Monotheism represents absolute rule from a ruler who knows what's best for his people, the "philosopher king" of Plato and in the case in the Old Testament history of Israel, the southern two tribe monarchy in Jerusalem over the northern ten tribe partial form of democracy.
Unlike monotheism and one-paradigm mentality, polytheism with its pluralism and multi-culturalism, take on the many acting democratic in nature. Many paradigms are taken in, contradictions are allowed, while the dominant ideologies are determined through the democratic majority, regulated by the rule of laws that have been democratically decided that benefit the common good of the collective. Such laws act as protective barriers against the "flight or fight" human response (amygdala brain function) in times of emergencies which can exhibit irrational behavior and vote for despotism against the democratic means. Democratic Germany prior to Nazism is a good example.
Mono-ideologies remain mono in their separation, in intoleration and the demonization of most or all alternative views. They exist in one-party political systems and the more fundamental religious ideologies. In ecology, the lack of biodiversity (pluralism) destroys entire ecosystems and sustainability. In monoculture agricultural applications, soil erosion and loss of farming occurs.
Monotheism and mono-ideologies are the very antitheses from the concept of Unity from a diversity, a one out of many, E pluribus unum, taken from Virgil's poem and written on the American dollar bill. Tyranny, the results of a nondemocratic, authoritarian rule, lack the alchemical ability to transform from mono to pluralistic views. The ability rests in allowing ambiguity and relativity while sustaining fundamental values. The dynamic movement of continual and evolving changes in questioning and adaptation is required in an evolving universe. Monotheism and monism represent the static burial resulting from psychological blockages in thought development. And in my opinion from observing and conversing with religious and political fundamentalists and dualistic "all or nothing" mindsets, such monistic worldviews may also be the results of neurological blockages. And yet monotheism and monism is found in political, social and economic ideologies, representing a stage in human conscious development.
The change from monism to pluralism is more than a simple change, it is more representative of an alchemical transformation or metamorphosis from "either-or," "all or nothing," polarized dualisms based on linear thinking to that of a holistic, "and-both" type widening of thought processes, which acts inter-dependent under relational thinking. It may be found in the psychological transformation which St. Paul spoke of in his hazy mirror and unspeakable third heaven, but certainly not when including all of the contradictory letters found in the New Testament.
What deities are worthy of worship? The one monotheistic Yahweh warlike and jealous god of the Judea-Christian bible who demands linear absolutes with absolute obedience under linguistic interpretations, tainted by social, political and cultural frameworks that demonizes ecumenical pragmatism? Or the pluralistic, polytheistic and multi-national gods and goddesses of the Geneva convention which puts inclusive laws including "war crimes" and human rights protections, above the linear absolutes of religious ideologies, individual nations and national boundaries?
Gods and goddess such as Zeus Agoraios (the god of the assembly) and the goddess Peitho of democratic debate and persuasion and the collective god of human decisions, the demos, are some of the democratic gods opposed to the intolerant-jealous, warring and monotheistic fascist Jehovah type god(s) and represent those in power as a more advanced culture under a more peaceful, humane,civil and democratic means. Parliaments, citizen participation, civil liberties and economic equitable distribution are the attributes of pluralism, while strict obedience under one ultimate decision maker using one-size-fits-all authoritative rule, rests in unchecked military dictatorships and in unregulated economic corporate controlled societies, defended in absolutism, monism and mono-economic ideologies, social and religious conservatives in monotheistic ones.
Mono-economic theories can rest in poly-other ideologies, as along as control rests in the highest bidder, and so the mono-market rules. Many Libertarian (mono-market) fighting corporations are plural culturalists (left) and some democratic corporations are mono-moralists. Overall, it's the first scenario that is dominant. However, the method of disinformation to confuse the public into either a nihilistic relativity or a monistic fundamentalism appear to the be current methods of persuasion that need to be rejected.
To the gods and goddesses! Blessed be!
Goddess
Mother Mary
Speaking words of wisdom . . . . . let it be
Zeus Agoraios, Peitho, Demos and Democracy
From the Trial of Socrates by I.F. Stone, pages 206-207;
In the fifth century Athens, Peitho had developed into a civic goddess of democracy, a symbol of the transition to rule by popular consent and consensus, achieved by debate and persuasion. Her political stature was reflected in the Athenian theater. "The unique character of Attic poetry," C.M. Bowra wrote, came "from the Athenian democracy itself. Tragedy was performed with religious solemnity . . . before a vast, critical amazingly intelligent audience. Such a performance was, in every sense a public event.
The Trial of Socrates, by I. F. Stone In their personification of Peitho as a civic goddess of Persuasion, the Athenians recast not only their religion but their mythology and history to suit the ideas of fifth-century democracy. They even claimed according to that most famous of ancient travelers, Pausanias, that the cult of Persuasion was first instituted by Theseus, the mythical first king of Athens. This venerable genealogy was, of course, quite unhistorical.
Perhaps the most striking references to Peitho in Attic theater are the Frogs of Aristophenes in 405 B.C., six years before the trial of Socrates. In that comedy, Aristophanes staged a debate between Aeschylus and Euripides in Hades. Euripides and Aeschylus (playwriters) hurl one-line quotations at each other about Persuasion from their plays, some now lost. These must have been familiar or the points made would not have been appreciated by the audience.
Euripides begins with a line from a lost play he wrote about Antigone. In it Persuasion is associated with logos, reasoned speech. Euripides says that Persuasion needs no shrine except logos and adds that her "alter is in the nature of man."
Aeschylus counters Euripides with a quotation from a lost play of his own, the Niobe, in which he said that death alone is impervious to Persuasion. Even Aristophanes who jokes about everything and makes Dionysus himself the butt of the coarsest humor in the same play, makes no jokes about Persuasion. That must have been the most extraordinary tribute of all to Peitho.
A generation later the two greatest masters of fourth-century oratory - Demosthenes and Isocrates - also list Peitho among the "gods of the city " and refer to annual sacrifices in her honor. There was a stature of her near the Acropolis and an ancient inscription tells us that here priestess had a special seat of honor in the Temple of Dionysus. She was commemorated in sculptures by Praxiteles and Pheidias. It could be significant that there is no reference to Peitho as a divinity anywhere in Xenophon or in Plato. They could hardly have venerated a civic goddess of the democracy they rejected. The Platonic contempt for persuasion and oratory as practiced in a democratic polity is summed up by Phaedrus in the dialogue that bears his name, "I have heard," he says, "that one who is to be an orator does not need to know what is really just, but what would seem just to the multitude who are to pass judgment, and not what is really good or noble, but what will seem to be so," and he adds sardonically that "persuasion comes from what seems to be true, not from the truth." Of course oratory can be misleading as well as enlightening. the same is true of Philosophy itself. Else why would philosophers so often - and so bitterly - disagree? But what better way to winnow out the truth than by free debate?
How effectively the cult of Peitho - and of the Zeus of the assembly - could have been invoked by Socrates in his own defense. To punish a philosopher for his opinions was no way to honor the goddess of Persuasion or the Zeus who symbolized and fostered free debate in the assembly. These "gods of the city," if appealed to, could have protected Socrates, too.
Peitho - The Civic Goddess of Democracy The Zeus Agoraios was the tutelary divinity which stood in the agora, the assembly, where the ultimate decisions of government were made. The political significance of this tribute by Athena to the Zeus Agoraios has often been lost in translation. It is sometimes rendered as the Zeus of the marketplace. An example turns up - I am sorry to say - in Gilbert Murray's Oresteia. There it is translated "Zeus, whose Word is in the Mart, prevailed." But the final victory in the Oresteia had nothing to do with the marketplace. It had to do with the agora as the place of assembly. The LSJ lexicon describes the Zeus Agoraios as the "guardian of popular assemblies." The political inference is also supported by Farnell in his Cults of the Greek States, where he says that the Zeus Agoraios was "the god who resided over assemblies and trials; it was he who, according to Aeschylus, awarded victory to Orestes in his trial for matricide.
The earliest reference to a Zeus Agoraios is in Herodotus, where a despot was slain by his rebellious people even though he took refuge at the altar of Zeus Agoraios, no doubt in the belief that they would not violate the sanctity of a god who symbolized the freedoms he himself had violated. Agora, of course, can mean either assembly or marketplace. But even if Homer it already meant place of assembly or trial. The word took on the meaning of marketplace later, presumable as a market grew up around the place of assembly. Similarly there developed two different kinds of gods termed agoraios. But the god of the assembly was a Zeus, the god of the marketplace was a Hermes. The same distinction is drawn in Chantraine's Dictionmaire etymologique de la langue grecque.
Athens also had a Zeus Boulaios as the tutelary divinity of its boule or council. According to Pausanias, this was flanked by two other statues, one of Apollo, and the other of Demos or the People, perhaps as a reminder of where the final authority lay. Today in the colonade of the Agora Museum in Athens there is a relief showing Democracy crowning Demos - an elderly bearded man seated on a throne. Under the Relief is the text of an inscription dated 336 B.C., which safeguards the rights of the people against tyranny.
there are two other passages in Pausanias about a deified Demos in Attica. One reference describes statues of "a Zeus and a Demos" side by side. The other passage also refers to a statue of Democracy itself. Was democracy at one time also personified as a civic goddess in Athens?
Neither Frazer's Golden Bough nor Roescher's ausfuehrliches" - and it is indeed "detailed" - German Lexicon of Greek and Roman Mythology mentions such a cult. But the leine Pauly under Demokratia says that in the latter half of the fourth century at least Democracy was deified in Athens and that its priest had a seat of honor in the theater of Dionysus next to the priest of Demos.
REFERENCES:
E pluribus unum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. (n.d.). Retrieved October 25, 2009, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_pluribus_unum
Stone, I. (1992). The Trial and Death of Socrates: Four Dialogues (Dover Thrift Editions). New York: Dover Publications.
The U.S. National Mottos: Their history & constitutionality . (n.d.). Retrieved October 24, 2009, from http://www.religioustolerance.org/nat_mott.htm